The following post is by 9/11 truth activist Dr. Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez M.D:
If Richard Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive people by claiming to present the best “scientific forensic evidence”, only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a cancer researcher only presented the evidence that supported his hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered his hypothesis, he would be ridiculed, criticized, and most likely fired from whatever institution he represented for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.
If Gage was searching for the truth, he would not silently ban his donating members for trying to help AE911Truth by sending him one email to share the large sum of important physical evidence that Gage does not talk about. Gage’s actions are not in the spirit of “unity”, and his actions are not in the spirit of scientific investigation of all the important physical evidence from 9/11. He even admits that he has not studied all of the scientific forensic evidence from 9/11, such as the NYC seismographic data, and he has also admitted that there is important physical evidence out there that he chooses not to talk about because thermite does not explain it (see Part 2 of my videos above when I ask him about the 1,400+ mangled, warped, and toasted cars, and the NYC seismographic data).
If Gage was searching for the truth, he would not lie to his audience and say “we censored his profile because Abraham had posted confusing information there”, because the truth is that I did not post any such information in my profile; rather, I sent him one private email, asking him if he was aware of the large sum of important physical evidence that I had never seen him discuss before.
If Gage was searching for the truth, he would not completely ignore the large sum of empirical evidence that thermite and explosives do not explain. Instead, he would address this evidence and modify his theory accordingly, so that his views are as scientific, as accurate, and as consistent with all of the important physical evidence from 9/11 as possible. Instead, Gage continues to promote non-scientific views, he continues to share only the small fraction of evidence that he wants people to see while not mentioning the large sum of empirical evidence that MUST be explained from 9/11, and he continues to deceptively act like he is a scientific person who cares about the truth despite his actions showing that he is just the opposite. This is deceptive, dishonest, and unscientific at best.
I could go on and on and on… but I would be wasting my time. Gage is obviously an intelligent person, so we truly must ask ourselves, how can someone this intelligent behave so unscientifically and unprofessionally? Is he really just that ‘dumb’, or is he doing this on purpose (perhaps because a boss requires him too)? I care not to speculate about the answer to such a question, because either way, Mr. Gage is misleading the 9/11 “Truth” Movement with his unscientific, unprofessional, and subtly dishonest behavior (in my humble opinion).
I think it is more-than-obvious that Richard Gage, Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Greg Jenkins, Richard Hoagland, Jim Fetzer, and others, are the second layer of the 9/11 cover up.
Please familiarize yourself with the evidence that Mr. Gage is not talking about.
For a partial, very brief summary of some of this important physical evidence, please see my ‘9/11 Challenge: Explain the Evidence’ article at this link (second article down from the top): http://pookzta.blogspot.com
For a complete, extensive list and discussion of all the important physical evidence Dr. Wood has discovered, please read her book, ‘Where Did The Towers Go?’, which you can purchase here: http://wheredidthetowersgo.com (of course, you can also view the evidence she has gathered at http://drjudywood.com for no cost at all, but the website information is somewhat scattered and harder to follow and the book contains some new information that is not found on the website, so for those who prefer to walk through the all of the evidence step by step in a more ‘simplified’, scientific textbook format, her new textbook is far superior to her website, in my opinion).
9/11 DISINFO DEBUNKED 
Recent Comments